Why Hillary Clinton Was Not Locked Up

by Daveda Gruber:

Whatever happened to locking up Hillary Clinton? We were waiting  patiently to see justice served and that day has not come. The FBI never gave Conservatives reason to feel that the guilty, no matter how far up the political chain, would be punished for the crimes they allegedly committed.

It appears that someone thought there was wrong doing. The FBI’s top lawyer in 2016 under ex-Director James Comey the FBI’s top lawyer thought that Hillary Clinton and her team should have immediately realized that they were mishandling “highly classified” information based on the obviously sensitive nature of the emails’ contents sent through Hillary’s private server.

According to a transcript of his closed-door testimony before congressional committees last October, former FBI general counsel James Baker believed she should have been prosecuted until “pretty late” in the investigation.

Baker said high-level officials at the bureau were “arguing about” whether to bring charges against Clinton. He originally thought that Clinton’s behavior was “alarming” and “appalling.”

Baker said, “So, I had that belief initially after reviewing, you know, a large binder of her emails that had classified information in them. And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that…we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that… she had the intent necessary to violate (the law).”

Baker told lawmakers that it was “the nature and scope of the classified information that, to me, initially, when I looked at it, I thought these folks should know that this stuff is classified, that it was alarming what they were talking about, especially some of the most highly classified stuff.”

Democrats clearly recall then candidate Donald Trump, while on the campaign trail, vowing to prosecute Mrs. Clinton if he won the election.

Brian Fallon, who was Mrs. Clinton’s campaign spokesman, said, “It was alarming enough to chant ‘lock her up’ at a campaign rally. It is another thing entirely to try to weaponize the Justice Department in order to actually carry it out.”

On the other hand, Conservatives said Mrs. Clinton should not be immune from scrutiny as a special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, investigates Russia’s interference in last year’s election and any connections to Mr. Trump’s campaign. They argued, for instance, that Mrs. Clinton was the one doing Russia’s bidding in the form of a uranium deal approved when she was Secretary of State.

A December letter by former House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy and former House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte said the decision not to prosecute Clinton was not unanimous.

Under questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, Baker spoke extensively about the back and forth arguments.

Here’s part of that discussion:

Ratcliffe: All right. Are you a reasonable prosecutor?

Baker: Not anymore. I’m not a prosecutor anymore. 

Then there is a quick exchange of questions and answers. Ratcliff pivots back to Baker’s decision to change his mind regarding Clinton.

Ratcliffe: You were persuaded, and stated as a basis, that ultimately you were persuaded there was a lack of evidence establishing knowledge or criminal intent, correct?

Baker: Yes.

Ratcliffe: When were you persuaded?

Baker: Sorry. Pretty late in the process, because we were arguing about it, I think, up until the end.

Ratcliffe: Yeah, So Jim Comey had reached the opposite conclusion as early as – or I guess as late as May the 2nd of 2017, as reflected in the memo that he created, correct?

Baker: I know there’s been a lot of public discussion about that – this way I experienced that interaction and other interactions with Jim Comey is he would throw things out like that to get people to start talking and thinking about it and test his conclusions against others and get them to push back. And so, it was – I believe it was in that process that I read these emails and we had these discussions and arguments.

Baker’s testimony was considered credible by those in the room.

In a televised interview on July 3, 2016, Clinton claimed that she had “never received nor sent any material that was marked classified” using her personal email system.

Later on she said she regretted using the setup after it emerged that her private servers contained classified materials from Special Access Programs, or SAP, which are considered some of the most closely held U.S. government secrets.

So, there you have it. Hillary was very close to being held accountable for her alleged negligent behavior. It appears that Comey’s influence stopped the investigation in its tracks.

#HillaryClintonIsGuilty

The Me Generation has struck again.

The Clintons, Obama, Loretta Lynch, and James Comey brazenly outlined, in a 72 hour period, that they can do anything they want and nothing will happen.

NOTHING.

Bill actually met with Loretta on a tarmac (I hang out on airplane parking lots all the time too) who then feigned ignorance while feeding the imbecilic a story about grand-children (Bill Clinton shouldn’t be allowed in the same State as any child).

Lynch weakly pushed the responsibility to FBI Director Comey (so much for Fidelity, Bravery, Integrity) who then stated quite clearly Hillary had broken many laws (felonies and misdemeanors).

His conclusion: No prosecution because she didn’t mean it.

She did it.

She broke the law but it doesn’t matter because her “intent” wasn’t to harm anyone.

Someone needs to remind him that isn’t his call to make (he isn’t the PROSECUTOR) never mind I didn’t know he could read minds.

James Comey…You are a stupid vile coward who just covered up for a woman who allowed hackers everywhere in the world to read TOP SECRET MATERIAL and many others we will never know about…as you admitted.

I guarantee those emails put human life in danger and the way this is being covered up I would venture someone was killed because of her behavior.

Of course “what difference does it make?”

The Democrats cheered, the Republicans cowered (as usual) while Lady Liberty prepared to put down her torch and pick up an AR-15.

Some have called this strike three for the Clintons.

Strike three?

This isn’t a game and if it were we passed balls and strikes a LONG time ago as the Progressives continue to strike at a Party of Republicans that behave like a bunch of Eunuchs.

Paul Ryan’s response was “we want to talk to the FBI Director.”

Comey’s response: Sure, I’ll be right down.  What are you going to do?  Send me away with my retirement like you did to Lois Lerner?

Ryan’s been harder on Trump (a man who hasn’t cast a vote on anything) than Clinton who we KNOW has broken laws.

How do we know this?

Comey just said so.

I just flashed back to a post written a few weeks ago about a friend who asked me what would happen after Orlando.

I said nothing and I was right.

What’s crazy right now is if I were to refer to Orlando 9 out of 10 would probably think I was talking about Disney World.

San Bernardino?

Where?

Boston?

Go Sawks!

Ladies and Gentlemen please pay attention.

I have an announcement.

The monkeys aren’t running the zoo.

The zoo was sacked a long time ago.

We are in the jungle.

Predators and Prey and if you aren’t sure which one you are…well…the Predators know.

The sheep have gotten fat and lazy and are content chewing their own cud while willing to embrace apathy, obesity, drugs, debt, and the wolves known as CAIR, La Raza, and Democratic Socialism.

There is a stench emitting from the Bubonic plague known as Progressivism.

It is contagious, deadly, and on the rise.

It’s time for the sheep dogs to take a walk and let the wolves thin the herd or better yet it’s time for the sheep dogs to create their own pack and discard the sheep altogether.

In medical terms the sheep have already accepted and approved of their frontal lobotomies.

This cannot be reversed and will only damage the rest of society by allowing the cancer known as Liberalism to survive.

Gangrene has set in and is pervasive in all forms of Government, specifically Washington D.C.

The rotten limb must be amputated lest it spread and devour the rest of us.

Mark Levin likes to say that we are living in a “post constitutional” time.

He is wrong.

This isn’t “post constitutional”.

This is Anti-Constitutional.

It’s Anti-Freedom.

It’s called oppression and just in case you still don’t understand, our biggest problem, isn’t Obama.

Believe it or not.

Our biggest oppressor(s) are the Central Banks around the world.

Free Will is a gift and as I’ve stated many times, Freedom isn’t Free.

The sheep are long gone passing their days in and out of a drunken stupor, inhaling clouds of medical marijuana, and gorging on genetically modified high fructose corn syrup.

Type-Two Diabetes, sobriety, and employment be damned.

The question now is how many Sheep Dogs will lose their lives in order to remain free.

How many good Americans will “get caught up in the switches?”

We need every Sheep Dog left and as this is now a jungle…it’s time to unleash the Lions.

The American Lion to be exact.

The Rule of Law no longer exists.

Stop pretending it does and refrain from verbiage like “civil disobedience”.

There is nothing civil about what is happening or going to happen and disobedience implies that we were obedient in the first place.

Americans aren’t obedient.

We are FREE.

We must return to the basics as we create the Post-Progressive America.

Love God.

Love one another.

Never again turn another cheek.

In God we Trust.

All others pay cash…or you can pay the wolf..but pay you will.

Freedom requires sacrifice.

The wolves can’t handle the Sheep dogs or the Lions.

The sheep can’t handle the wolves.

James Comey just sealed the fate of the sheep.

How many Sheep Dogs are lost depends upon us.

Gather your Pride.

All Lions to the front.

History tells us it won’t be too much longer.

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com