Category Archives: opinion

Who Wore it Better?

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

When you are as beautiful as First Lady Melania Trump, your fashion sense will be out for the world to see. As the first lady accompanied President Donald Trump on their five day state visit to Europe, they headed for Air Force One to end the successful trip.

FLOTUS has fashion experts’ full attention when she goes out in public and this trip had the ‘fashion police’ on full alert.

Melania was compared to Jackie Kennedy in an outfit she wore as the first couple boarded Air Force One at Shannon Airport to return to the U.S.

The First Lady looked elegant on Friday donning in a beige Burberry trench coat and black Louboutin pumps. The outfit was topped off with a baby blue Hermes headscarf paired with oversized sunglasses.

The scarf and sunglasses are what made the look go viral.

Jackie Kennedy was a lovely first lady and always seemed to have a wonderful fashion sense.

Melania knocked the look ‘out of the park’.  She wowed on-lookers and photographers as she walked to the plane in Ireland with her hair shielded to the wind in her baby blue scarf.

Our First Lady is not only beautiful, but she is doing a wonderful job with children as her priority, as one of her official public and ceremonial duties.

Here is what FLOTUS Report had to say on Twitter:

Have Tariff Threats Inspired Mexico to Deploy Military?

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

Tariffs are set to be imposed on Mexico by the Trump administration unless our southern neighbor stops the flow of illegal migrants using the country to cross into the U.S.

Mexico has gotten the message that tariffs would be used as a punishment because of the country’s ineptness at stopping migrants who walk and take buses through the terrain to cross legally and illegally into America.

Reports are claiming allegations that Mexico’s negotiators with Washington have offered to deploy 6,000 National Guard troops to the border with Guatemala without delay. Also, it is reported that they will do an overhaul of asylum protocols which would require asylum seekers to request permanent refuge in the first country they arrive in after fleeing their home countries.

It is not known yet If Mexico’s efforts will satisfy the White House.

All Central American migrants would therefore not be coming to the United States and instead stay in Mexico as permanent refugees as this would be the first country that they arrive in after fleeing their homeland.

Because so many migrants have abused the system, the Trump administration has already begun requiring asylum applicants to wait in Mexico while they are being processed.

The talks between the U.S. and Mexico have been going well but there isn’t a deal yet that is certain to be accepted by the U.S.

On Thursday Mexico’s financial intelligence agency has made an announcement that it had frozen the bank accounts of 26 people who it claimed “have presumably participated in migrant smuggling and the organization of illegal migrant caravans.”

Money transfers have been detected from central Mexico to six Mexican border cities which are presumed to be related to the caravans.

In the midst of all this President Andrés Manuel López Obrador of Mexico stated that the Mexican government does not “act against anybody to please any foreign government.”

The Mexican president may not want to please the U.S. but he still managed to deploy about 200 Mexican military police, immigration agents and federal police to block the advance of about 1,000 Central American migrants who were walking north along a southern Mexico highway.

This move is showing that they are taking a tough stance on migrants walking through the country.

This particular “caravan” of people, which includes women and children, set out from Ciudad Hidalgo at the Mexico-Guatemala border. They were headed for Tapachula which is the principal city in the region while state and local police accompanied the caravan.

Officials blocked the highway near the community of Metapa, which is about 11 miles from Tapachula. It got a little messy and unarmed agents had to wrestle some of the migrants to the ground.

Most of the migrants did comply with authorities and boarded buses or immigration agency vans. Some of these migrant fainted or fell to the ground. One man needed medical attention.

While this was going on, police in Mexico City detained Irineo Mujica, who is the head of the migrant aide group, Pueblo Sin Fronteras, and Cristobal Sanchez, who is a migrant activist.

When the tariffs were announced by President Trump last week, he promised that they would swiftly increase if no action was taken by the Mexican government.

On May 30th Trump said in two tweets, “On June 10th, the United States will impose a 5% Tariff on all goods coming into our Country from Mexico, until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP. The Tariff will gradually increase until the Illegal Immigration problem is remedied, … ..at which time the Tariffs will be removed. Details from the White House to follow.”

Trump tweeted this on May 30:

A statement released by the White House on Thursday read:

“If Mexico still has not taken action to dramatically reduce or eliminate the number of illegal aliens crossing its territory into the United States, Tariffs will be increased to 15 percent on August 1, 2019, to 20 percent on September 1, 2019, and to 25 percent on October 1, 2019. Tariffs will permanently remain at the 25 percent level unless and until Mexico substantially stops the illegal inflow of aliens coming through its territory.”

“Thousands of innocent lives are taken every year as a result of this lawless chaos.  It must end NOW! … Mexico’s passive cooperation in allowing this mass incursion constitutes an emergency and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States.”

FOX News reported that White House Sources say that Mexico would need to step up security efforts on the border, target transnational smugglers, crack down on illicit bus lines and align with the U.S. on a workable asylum policy. Mexico could use certain so-called choke points on the southern border to curb illegal migration sharply,

Arrests and apprehensions have increased drastically in the past few months. More than 4,000 individuals have been apprehended at the border with children who are not their own but a backlog of more than 800,000 cases.

Still, asylum applicants have increasingly been staying in the U.S. even after their claims for asylum have been denied for having an insufficient or unfounded personalized fear of persecution.

Last year, the Justice Department eliminated gang violence and domestic abuse as a possible justification for seeking asylum. After all, we have those problems here in the U.S., so, no one is escaping this by coming here.

U.S. border patrol agents have been working hard in their efforts to protect our border but Mexico has to help out here.

America is full up. We can no longer afford to help our own homeless Americans.

Trump is showing strength and it seems to be working. We cannot let illegal migrants walk through our border any longer. This has to stop and the time is NOW!

Flynn Abruptly Fires Legal Team While Awaiting Sentencing

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

While awaiting sentencing after pleading guilty to charges in his criminal case, former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn abruptly fired his legal team.

A new legal team has already been retained by Flynn who, in an interesting move, has cut his relationship with the law firm Covington & Burling which had represented Flynn in the past.

A two page motion was filed by the well-respected legal team Flynn has used since the start of the Russia probe. Covington lawyers Robert Kelner and Stephen Anthony in D.C. federal court on Thursday. The attorneys asked the court for permission to formerly withdraw from the case.

The motion read, “General Flynn has notified the undersigned that he is terminating Covington & Burling LLP as his counsel and has already retained new counsel for this matter.”

It is not known, as of yet, which law firm has been hired by Flynn.

During an interview in January 2017, Flynn had pleaded guilty to providing false statements to the FBI. In December 2016, he admitted to lying about his communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.

Flynn had spent a lot of time with former Special Counsel Mueller and federal prosecutors and was fully cooperating with them.

Flynn’s friends and family have accused Mueller’s team of deception and argued that Flynn was tricked into pleading guilty. Some have urged Flynn to seek to withdraw his plea. Maybe that is the next order of business?

Flynn has not wavered from asking Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan, to delay his sentencing while he continued his government cooperation.

Sullivan has yet to set a sentencing date even though Flynn attended a sentencing hearing in December 2018.

Federal prosecutors have refused to release a transcript of recorded conversations between Flynn and Kislyak that Sullivan had requested in May. Prosecutors stated that the transcript was not relevant in ascertaining that Flynn was guilty or in making a sentencing recommendation.

Remember that this was a part of the Robert Mueller Russian probe and as we have come to learn, those people are out for blood.

I don’t know if General Flynn is innocent or guilty but I can tell you this, the investigation went out of control and people in every walk of life who had dealings with then citizen Donald J. Trump and now President Trump were dragged through the mud.

Personally, I believe that Flynn is a good man and didn’t deserve to have all this dumped on him.

Car Wreck as Clear as Mudd?

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

On Tuesday former FBI official, retired CIA operative and CNN counter-terrorism analyst, Phil Mudd, gave his opinion as to what he thinks about the author of the famous anti-Trump dossier that led to the Russia probe, Christopher Steele, being interviewed by the Justice Department.

Mudd was on CNN and spoke about what Steele might say when being questioned. He noted that it could turn out disastrously for the former British spy.

Attorney General William (Bill) Barr has appointed John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, to conduct the inquiry into the alleged misconduct and alleged improper government surveillance on the Trump campaign in 2016.

It is thought that Durham will be the person to interview Steele. Durham is also the person looking into how Steele’s Democrat-funded dossier was used by the FBI to secure surveillance warrants for a former Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page, in 2016, despite concerns about its credibility.

The interview is scheduled to take place in London within a few weeks. We can assume that Steele will be asked if his information in the dossier on Trump’s ties to Russia was verified and Steele will say no.

Steele should be giving Durham a true statement because even though the questioning is being done out of the country, Durham can indict Steele and force him to come to the U.S. if he lies.

Mudd said this could turn into a “car wreck” for Steele if he goes forward.

Mudd said, “If you go to car races looking for car wrecks, this is significant. This will be a car wreck.”

It is highly unlikely that Steele will have sufficient answers on how he compiled the dossier.

Mudd also said, “I can’t believe he has perfect answers about the origins of the Steele dossier. I’m not even sure why he’s showing up. If I were him, I’d go to Disney World. I would not go to the Department of Justice, because it will not end up well.”

Mudd seems to think that Steele may want to be interviewed to possibly clear his name and possibly be able to go back to working in the private sector.

Mudd said, “Let me give you how this game ends. Christopher Steele shows up in front of the Department of Justice and I’m guessing doesn’t have terrific answers for the quality of the information in that Steele dossier.”

Okay, I do agree with Mudd on this. In my humble opinion, Steele’s dossier was a compilation of information gathered to prove possible collusion with Russia and the Trump campaign. It was unverified and has no collaborating sources.

I’ve written about the dossier so much in the past that I’m rather excited about Steele answering questions. This is a step forward to finally investigating the investigators, after all, Steele was the investigator who was hired/paid for by Democrats, the DNC and the Clinton 2016 election campaign.

Would anyone like to be a fly on the wall to hear what Steele has to say? I would!

The show has begun. My popcorn is smelling good now.

Did a Spy Come in from the Cold?

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

The author of the famous anti-Trump dossier that led to the Russia probe, former British spy, Christopher Steele, has agreed to be questioned.

According to “The Times” (UK), investigators from the United States are scheduled to question Steele in London within weeks.

The 54 year old Steele, who compiled a dossier on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia, will be questioned by investigators, who’s names have not been revealed as yet.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election. Now, attention is back on the dossier, which was at the helm of the investigation.

Steele has allegedly told the Department of Justice that he would only discuss his dealings with the FBI and wanted assurances that U.S. officials would secure the agreement of the British government.

The British government has not commented.

The origins of the Russia probe has several ongoing investigations at this time. Being investigated are how the Democrat-funded dossier, which was written by Steele, was used to secure surveillance warrants for former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page in 2016.

There are disputed trails of information on whether former CIA Director John Brennan or former FBI Director James Comey had somehow used and pushed the unverified dossier during the presidential transition.

Testimony by Steele has been sought by Congressional committees but have been, so far, unsuccessful.

Steele drafted the dossier while he was working for political opposition firm Fusion GPS, which was co-founded by Glenn Simpson.

Steele has previously declined to be interviewed. He had cited the potential impropriety of his involvement in an internal Justice Department investigation as a foreign national. Did something change? I believe so. Mueller’s report didn’t come out as originally planned.

Attorney General William Barr appointed John Durham, the U.S. Attorney in Connecticut, to review the FBI’s Russia probe. Barr did testify that “spying” did occur against the Trump campaign during the 2016 campaign. Barr has made it clear that he wants to get to the bottom of the entire Russian probe.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz is probing how the dossier compiled by Steele was used to secure the original surveillance warrant.

Barr has said that he has not received answers from the intelligence community that are “at all satisfactory” in the early stages of his review into the origins of the Russian investigation.

Barr told CBS News, “Like many other people who are familiar with intelligence activities, I had a lot of questions about what was going on. And I assumed I’d get answers when I went in, and I have not gotten answers that are at all satisfactory.”

Barr was questioned by Senator Chuck Grassley, R-IA., and this particular testimony is worth listening to.

Watch the testimony here:

Republicans in Congress and President Trump have maintained that the dossier was the root of what tuned into the Russian probe.

When the Mueller report was ready to be released, Senator Lindsey Graham R-SC., had this to say:

We know that the Steele Dossier was at the stem of the Mueller Russia investigation and was paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign. It bewilders me as to why these facts have not been brought to light with the proof to back it up.

Could it be that a key factor of proof lies in Steele’s testimony? We don’t know what is in Steele’s head but we should want to find out.

Another suicide is not what we need now, if you get my drift.

This show has started but we still have to wait for the exciting parts. My popcorn is ready.

Mueller Will Not Fade into Private Life Yet – Here’s Why

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

Former Special Counsel, Robert Mueller doesn’t want to be in the hot seat and testify to Congress but House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., does not want to accept Mueller’s unwillingness to speak up on certain issues.

Mueller is ready for private life to begin and has been adamant in saying that he will not testify to Congress about his investigation into the 2016 election. Schiff has other plans for Mueller and was clear on his views.

Schiff was on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday and said, “I think he has one last service to perform.”

Schiff continued, “It’s not enough merely to speak for 10 minutes and say, ‘I’m not going to answer questions for Congress and the American people.’ There are a great many things that are not in the report.”

The California Senator went on to say, “We want to find out what happened to those counterintelligence findings that were sent back to headquarters. And in terms of if the president is vulnerable of influence from Russia.”

Schiff added that he was “disappointed” Mueller has, in his mind, displayed a “profound reluctance to testify.”

In the interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, Schiff told him that he would want the chance to question Mueller about topics not covered in the report.
You can see the interview here:

Now, Schiff would like his demands met but Mueller has expressed that he would not say anything other than what is already in his report.

Last Wednesday, in his address to the nation, Mueller said, “The report is my testimony.”

Schiff went on to say, “I hope Bob Mueller will understand, as painful as it may be and as much as it may subject him to further abuse by the White House, he has a final duty here to perform, like any other witness,” he continued. “And it’s my hope that he’ll do so and it’s my hope that he’ll do so voluntary.”

You can see the full interview here:

President Trump has not wavered in his beliefs that the Russia investigation politically motivated.

“How do you impeach a Republican President for a crime that was committed by the Democrats? WITCH-HUNT!”
Tump tweeted last week:

Is the “WITCH HUNT” over or will we see the Democrats try to milk it for all it’s worth? Chances are that until the investigators are thoroughly investigated and held accountable for any spying or use of reputed information to obtain a FISA warrant, Trump will be attacked by Democrats for deeds that he allegedly committed.

It’s True Because I Say it is

 
Leave a comment

This week while Robert Mueller stammered through a cowardly press conference, President Trump, among other things, slapped tariffs on Mexico.

It’s been a long time coming.

I am hoping he increases them to a point that Mexico will stop the invasion of these United States.

This of course brought out the Liberals, RINOS, and Mitt Romney disguised as Justin Amash, ranting that tariffs are taxes and the cost of these things is passed to the American consumer.

Let’s take it one at a time, these are Progressives after all.

Regardless of how many talking heads say this on television or radio, tariffs are not taxes just like the United States of America is not a Democracy.  I’d explain this further but I’ve decided on items, that Obama voters are too dumb to understand, I must “hope” for a new path and “change” my ways.

On this issue I will attempt to go the way of the Democratic-Socialist-CheekbonesCherokee-BetoMales.

I will provide no facts, figures, or supporting documents.

I will practice true Liberal lunacy and use their go to statement for everything.

It’s true because I say it is.

How Progressive and Yahoo News of me!

Furthermore as I also now refrain, from verbal interaction with the Stupid Humans, I will move on.

Never fear Progressives.

I am still here for non-verbal communication and if you continue to attempt to force Oppression down our throats you will soon be having your AT&T occasion.

That’s a fact Jack!

Just felt like having a Bill Murray moment.

The second part of this equation is the theory that the tariffs get passed to the American consumer.

Most of the time this doesn’t happen.

It just doesn’t, and if it does, it is negligible.

Can you explain this with your normal aplomb and in-depth analysis?

I could but remember, these are Liberals. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not.

It’s true because I say it is!

Did Donald Trump “collude” with the Russians?

Of course not but the Libs think so.

Should rapists, killers, child molesters, and illegal foreign nationals vote?

Absolutely not but the Dems are making it happen.

Why are we spending any time explaining things to those who vote for Pelosi, Schumer, or Cortez?

Just stop.

We are wasting energy.

It’s comparable to giving mouth to mouth to road kill.

It isn’t going to matter.

That dog just won’t hunt.

In fact it may increase the chances of catching the deadly virus known as Democratic Unintelligent Mindless Boobs also known as DUMB.

If they can put vaginas on their heads I can use boobs.

Let’s just push them out to sea for their own Noah-like journey (minus the Ark) and let them join the millions of other empty vessels floating about serving no purpose other than to jam up the natural flow of the ecosystem known as Freedom.

Maybe the Flat Earth/Climate Controllers will finally find a corner and fall off completely.

We won’t know until we try.

I say let’s embrace all of the Progressive tendencies.

Abortion on demand?

You got it!

If babies are referred to as inconsequential because they cannot “function” then it’s time to “abort” the Progressives.

Talk about not functioning.

What’s not good for the goose is not good for the gander.

Then again Liberals don’t know the difference between the goose and the gander so let the demand begin!

This will go well with the embracing of the next Liberal issue.

Climate Change.

By “aborting” all the Progressives we will be dramatically reducing our Carbon footprint.

Just getting rid of Al Gore, the Clintons, and the Obamas will probably drop the temperature of the planet to a point where cows can be cows again.

Thanks AOC!

Let’s spare Out of Control Alex.

We will need someone to serve us drinks due to all the free time we will have with not having to deal with feces, urine, hypodermic needles, breaking dams, southern invasion, northern Trudeau, and government unions sucking us dry of our money and souls.

Let’s give em the old college try, the Teddy Roosevelt routine, because we know Liberals like to tell everyone how Progressive T.R. was.

Let’s Rough Rider them right into the ground and then allow them to stay as they lay.

This new world without so much “Carbon” is going to need fertilizer, besides as I’ve stated before, crows gotta eat too.

It’s Heckle and Jeckle time.

What’s that?

Heckle and Jeckle were magpies?

Yes I know but remember we’re dealing with Libs.

The truth doesn’t matter.

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com

www.freeamericanetwork.com

Schiff Alleges Trump’s Policy Threatens National Security

  ,
Leave a comment

by DavedaGruber:

On Friday the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, D-Calif., adamantly criticized the Trump administration for dangerously politicizing the Intelligence Community.

Schiff is requesting that the IC agencies provide more information about the president’s order which would allow them to declassify information related to the Russian probe.

Schiff has alleged that Trump’s policy threatened national security and he now wants the IC to provide all documents made available to Attorney General William Barr.

Schiff wants his committee, before any declassification, to provide an assessment on declassification’s harms to national security.  He also wants an in-person briefing on what the administration had requested to that point.

According to Schiff, Trump endangered national security by granting Barr the authority to declassify information without consulting with the IC.

Schiff wrote, in a letter to Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, “President Trump’s May 23, 2019 directive to you and other heads of agencies to assist and produce information to Attorney General William P. Barr … represents a disturbing effort by the President and the Attorney General to politicize the Intelligence Community (“IC”) and law enforcement, and raises grave concerns about inappropriate and misleading disclosures of classified information and IC sources and methods for political ends.”

Schiff sent his letters to the directors of National Intelligence, Dan Coats; the FBI Director, Christopher Wray; CIA and National Security Agency, Director Gen. Paul Nakasone.
President Trump had imposed an order in an push to accelerate his Justice Department’s investigation into the Russia investigation’s origins.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller was unable to conclude the president’s 2016 campaign engaged in a conspiracy with Russia. This has brought up questions as to how the whole Russian probe began.

Schiff has suggested that the administration’s argument behind that investigation was a “conspiracy theory” and that it incorrectly mistrusted the validity of Mueller’s probe.

Schiff said, “The Special Counsel’s report definitively establishes that the counterintelligence investigation was properly initiated based on credible information from an intelligence partner. Yet the Attorney General has called into question, without evidence, the validity of the predication of what became the Special Counsel’s investigation.”

Schiff also said, “This approach threatens national security by subverting longstanding rules and practices that obligate you and other heads of IC agencies to safeguard sources and methods and prevent the politicization of intelligence and law enforcement.”

Former FBI Director James Comey, who led the Russia investigation during the 2016 presidential election, had basically expressed similar views when he said, “The FBI wasn’t out to get Donald Trump. It also wasn’t out to get Hillary Clinton. It was out to do its best to investigate serious matters while walking through a vicious political minefield.”

In an interview on Friday with CBS, Barr, he has vowed to get to the bottom of the investigation’s origins. He admitted that he faced difficulty in obtaining the answers he needed and said, “I assumed I’d get answers when I went in, and I have not gotten answers that are at all satisfactory.”

Republicans see the situation differently. They have demanded accountability after the release of Mueller’s report. The main concern here is the controversial Steele dossier’s role in initiating the investigation.

One key witness who is expected to refuse to cooperate with the review is former British spy Christopher Steele who is the author of the controversial “dossier” about alleged Trump interactions with Russia.

Congressional Democrats are continuing to press the administration for more answers surrounding Mueller’s investigation.

The roadblocks are in place as the president invoked executive privilege to avoid complying with subpoenas.

Now, some Democrats have taken their party’s efforts further and are calling for impeachment proceedings against the president. They don’t have enough support from their own party to impeach and Republicans, except for Justin Amash, R-Mich., don’t want impeachment.

In my humble opinion, the Steele dossier is the key factor here. The FISA warrant was issued because the dossier’s allegations helped justify the FISA warrant to wiretap former Trump adviser Carter Page.

The dossier now serves as an exhibit for the defense rather than the prosecution.

The show is about to begin. Stay tuned; the trailers are running in my head and I’m excited to see what happens next.

Mueller Speaks to America and Fuels Democrat Impeachment Talk

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

On Wednesday morning Special Counsel Robert Mueller delivered his first public statement since he finished his probe on Russian interference during the 2016 presidential election.

The report was handed over to William Barr on March 22.

The White House was advised on Tuesday night of Mueller’s plans to speak to the American people. .

The speech didn’t tell much to those of us who have read the Mueller report. Mueller only said what was already in his report that he had given to Barr. Mueller said that his report was his final testimony.

Mueller said, “If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not determine whether the president did commit a crime.”

Mueller explained longstanding Justice Department policy, which states that a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime.

Mueller went on to say, “Charging the president with a crime was not an option we could consider. It would be unfair to accuse someone of a crime when there could be no court resolution of the charge.”

Mueller added, “We concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime.  That is the office’s final position.”

The words that there was “insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy” were carefully chosen as was all word usage.

Mueller did state that there were efforts made by the Russians to influence the 2016 presidential election.

It was made very clear that Mueller will be leaving the DOJ and stepping into private life. He wants to move forward and believes that everyone should do the same.

Mueller made it clear that there was not enough evidence or insufficient evidence to reach a conclusion. It appears also that he tried to make the point that not coming to a conclusion, but investigating if there was evidence that a crime was committed, was what he was supposed to do.

You can see Mueller’s speech here:

 

Mueller said he will not be testifying to Congress but Congress could issue a subpoena for him to testify. Would he comply with a subpoena? He did say that his speaking today would be the last time we would hear from him. Do I expect a subpoena? Yes, I do.

I will assume that President Trump was watching Mueller speak, live. Following Mueller’s address, Trump tweeted this out this:

The Democrats will take this verbiage and dwell on the words that you cannot indict a sitting president. This will be misconstrued and reported as that there was a crime but it could not be proven.

So, was Mueller telling Congress that he provided a roadmap  and that Congress  should run with it? Did Mueller put the ball in Congress’s court? That seems to be what the feedback from the Democratic side of the political spectrum is spewing.

This investigation was never about indicting the president on obstruction because it is not possible, within the law, to do so. The only way that this case will ever get closed for good is if and when the real criminals are brought to justice.

The Steele Dossier was never even a point of the Mueller investigation. The dossier has to be investigated. The creators of the dossier must be investigated and the person or people who paid for the dossier must be investigated.

What the heck did we, the American people, pay for? Was the investigation, on its own basis, actually needed? The only part of this investigation that makes any sense is that they found that Russians did try to influence an American election. There was never any collusion with the Trump campaign and Russia.

In Their Honor and the Fullness of Time

 
Leave a comment

Periodically the subject(s) for my weekly columns take a little bit to find. Other times they scream to be written, and every once in a while, they search me out.

I was sought this week.

It won’t be reported in the papers or found on any blotter. Most would consider it random although I’m sure it has happened plenty of times prior, just not to me.

Without getting into the entire story (maybe I’ll add it to Late Bird Rising) a situation occurred, in the middle of a busy road, that required me to engage in a matter that wasn’t good for my central nervous system. Once the situation was contained my focused demeanor immediately turned to rage.

Rage that the situation ever occurred.

It shouldn’t have.

Rage at the individual(s) who put my safety in jeopardy.

I have no doubt this group of idiots has done this to other drivers.

Let us hope, for the safety of others, my response to him(them) did more than just release their bowels.

For those of you who have read Late Bird you know that migraines are a part of my life. I’ve done the best I can to control them but bright or strobe lights, nuts, or highly stressful situations usually lead to one happening somewhere in my near future.

I abstain from nuts and do my best to avoid intense lights, but occasionally complete strangers, will attempt to cause drama in my life.

It isn’t just me.

Complete strangers attempt to cause stress in everyone’s life across these United States.

They’re called Liberals.

This was a highly stressful situation and my response, although appropriate, was so intense I knew my head would be pounding in about an hour. I went on with my day completely prepared to deal with numb lips and fingertips, nausea, loss of vision and eventually an incredible pain that resonates for two days through my neck and head.

As I’ve stated before I’ve had these since I was a kid.

Just a part of my life.

This time a funny thing happened.

Even though I vacillated a little too long on the event, trying to “clear the mechanism,” the headache never arrived.

It appeared my response to those who created the situation, allowed me to remove the stress from my body, and return it to those who created it in the first place.

It’s time we do the same thing to the traitors in this country.

Let those who create the suffering, suffer the pain.

Every day “new” findings and documents are brought forward on the disastrous and treasonous Obama Administration.

Of course this isn’t new to those of us who pay attention, but as these things come to light, pressure/stress is being applied to our American systems, many that have already capitulated.

Roads that crumble, dams that break, schools that indoctrinate and graduate children who cannot read.

Trillions in debt with even more to come.

Politicians who lie, cheat, and steal and are so brazen, criminals with connections and secrets like Jussie Smollett, simply walk out the door, while Progressive judges sneak criminal foreign nationals out the back of our courthouses.

On this Memorial Day Weekend, with respect, appreciation, and admiration we praise the ultimate sacrifice of the American who because of their service, and last full measure of devotion, granted us the privilege of living in a free country.

On this day I say in their honor and the fullness of time,

Prepare to RAGE.

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com

www.freeamericanetwork.com