Hunter Biden $450 DC Lien Paid

by Daveda Gruber

The son of presumptive Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, had to come up with some money.

Allegedly a tax lien filed against him in July for $453,890. It was released just six days later. The issue was resolved according to the Washington Free Beacon.

The younger Biden had claimed to be broke during a child custody case where Biden eventually agreed to make child support payments.

He had failed to turn over financial records in that case.

Even so, when the lien was placed on July 9th, it was released on July 15th.

It was not confirmed if the lien was paid.

Hunter Biden’s finances have been under scrutiny since a private investigator made an attempt to intervene in the child custody case in 2019.

A private investigation firm had claimed that in December they lawfully obtained access to Biden’s bank account records. That collection of information confirmed his involvement in a massive, $156 million “counterfeiting scheme.”

Biden’s legal team strongly denied the claims which were said to be unverified.

They called the effort by the Florida-based D&A Investigations an obviously bogus scheme by a non-party simply to make scandalous allegations in the pending suit. They also claimed that it was to gain media attention without any material or pertinent material.

Biden’s financial matter came to light in connection with the House’s impeachment inquiry effort of President Trump.

Instead of finding an impeachable offense against Trump, Hunter Biden’s seat on Burisma Holdings, which is an energy company in Ukraine, was uncovered.

Burisma had been under investigation by Ukrainian authorities in the past. Then Vice President Biden used pressure to have the prosecutor in charge fired to which many called a quid pro quo.

The elder Biden denies any wrong doing.

If Hunter Biden had enough money to come up with it in six days, maybe he wasn’t as broke as he claimed?

Maybe daddy picked up the tab? Your guess is as good as mine.

The whole affair appears sketchy to me but then certain people never seem to face justice for the potentially illegal deeds thy do.

Impeachment Inquiry: No Firsthand Information?

by Daveda Gruber:

On Wednesday, Democrats released a transcript of testimony from U.S. diplomat Bill Taylor in conjunction with the Democrats releasing the transcripts of closed-door sessions.

According to the document in question, Taylor told congressional lawmakers who are conducting the impeachment inquiry that President Trump was willing to hold up aid of a military nature to Ukraine to insure investigations that could help him politically.

Taylor, a top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine said, “That was my clear understanding, security assistance money would not come until the President [of Ukraine] committed to pursue the investigation.”

Also, in the transcript Taylor says that other officials told him that the White House was willing to hold up military aid and a prospective White House meeting to obtain a public announcement from Ukraine that would solidify that probes were in progress that related to election interference and a company, Burisma, linked to former Vice President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter.

Burisma Holdings is the Ukrainian natural gas company where Hunter Biden was employed in a high end role and made an exorbitant amount of money despite not having any knowledge of business practices.

Republicans contend that Taylor didn’t have first hand information and his recollection was that of what others around him were saying.

Taylor was asked by GOP Rep. Lee Zeldin  if he had any “firsthand knowledge” of Trump making it a condition that an investigation into the 2016 election and the Bidens would bear upon military aid.

Taylor made it clear that he did not speak to the president or have any communication with the president on this matter.

He did say that he was basing his testimony on what former United States Special Representative for Ukraine Negotiations, Kurt Volker, and E.U. ambassador Gordon Sondland had told him.

Taylor said, “What I know is what Ambassador Sondland was able to tell me about those investigations and Ambassador Volker. I don’t know what was in the President’s mind.”

Taylor was adamant that he didn’t have “firsthand” communication with the president or the president’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

Beyond not communicating directly with President Trump or Giuliani, he testified that a July 28 conversation with National Security Council aide Tim Morrison told him of a conversation between Sondland and top Ukraine aide Andriy Yermak that security assistance money would not come until Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy committed to pursue the Burisma investigation.

Taylor said in his testimony, “I was alarmed by what Mr. Morrison told me about the Sondland-Yermak conversation. This was the first time I had heard that the security assistance not just the White House meeting — was conditioned on the investigations.”

Taylor said that Sondland asked him to call after Taylor texted a message asking if security assistance and a White House meeting “are conditioned on investigations.”

Those text messages have been released but the details of the phone call were not spelled out.

Taylor testified, “During that phone call, Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelenskyy to state publicly that Ukrain will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.”

On Tuesday, it was revealed in a released document that Sondland revised his prior testimony to say that he told a top Ukrainian official that U.S. aid would likely not resume until the country issues a corruption statement. To the Democrats that was proof of the quid pro quo they have been alleging took place.

In September Sondland had texted Taylor that there was no quid pro quo. The supplemental declaration says that “by the beginning of September 2019, and in the absence of any credible explanation for the suspension of aid, I presumed that the aid suspension had become linked to the proposed anti-corruption statement.”

Sondland agreed that he told one of Zelensky’s advisers that “resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks.”

It has been alleged that claims from Sondland are an assumption and are not based on fact.

Sondland is adamant that he did not know and still doesn’t know who or why the aid was suspended.

Open hearing will begin next week.