The Trump Chronicle

by Daveda Gruber

Do you enjoy politics? What about poetry? I love both and found the perfect set of books to read with both combined, to stimulate my adventurous mind.

When the books were first delivered, I peeked inside and was amazed at finding all the bits of information that I’ve seen unfold in politics but in poetic form.

Have you archived history? Well, Irvin R. Brookstein is doing it for us. His books are named The Trump Chronicle and each is a year in politics in poetic format.

The history of America is being chronicled by Brookstein, yes, in poetic form that is a delight to read. I have, in my possession, copies of the book that records from 11/8/16 to 12/9/17 and the one that archives from 11/11/17 to 11/7/18.

Life moves so quickly that there are times when I lose track of the significant political events that happen day to day, week to week and month to month.

Brookstein is an author who enjoys politics. In fact, he enjoys being so aware of the political views that he delves into storms of the mind and in actual life.

His poetry is a look at his way of seeing things. He takes you on an adventure that he has, himself, witnessed.

From the election that took place in 2016 to foreign lands that have their own politics to deal with to events such as the North Korean Summit.

You’ll read about the American Flag and MAGA hats and get insight as to what they represent.

He doesn’t leave out anything of any importance as his books play out the scenario and logs everything that has happened in the United States and elsewhere, but in poetic form.

You’ll hear about the shootings that have left innocent people dead and other saddening events and also who got invited to the White House and who didn’t take the invitation as an honor.

You will find out what is “Blowing in the Wind” with the FBI and the DOJ in an entertaining way.

Each poem has a title, of course, and I’m sure that you will find them as eye-catching as I did. They tend to draw you into each piece as you turn the pages.

I feel that the books are a part of American and yes, even world history. I’ll cherish my copies and hold them dear to my heart as they are something that I will go back to read over and over again in my lifetime. They will hold a place of respect in my house.

Brookstein is a very talented writer and will keep you entertained. You’ll want to read more and hopefully another book will be published soon because I’d want to read it. You’ll find out by reading this book that Brookstein’s muse is addictive. No one can get enough of it.

The books are available on Amazon and are available in a kindle format or in hard copy.

You can find this man, who seems pen about everyday politics to world events, on Twitter under the name RayRay @RayPoetry.

Believe me, he is worth the follow. You won’t be sorry when you find out what he has to say.

We Represent the Lollipop Kids

Seeing as though the Progressives love to live in the Sixties I thought it appropriate to ask the question,”Liberals, huh, yeah, what are they good for, absolutely nothing, say it again y’all.”

Then again it appears for one Democrat the Sixties weren’t far enough as Bilbo de Blasio channeled the Thirties and burst out with his version of “We represent the lollipop kids.”

Ladies and Gentlemen I give you Warren Wilhelm Jr., willing to represent fictional characters and Criminal Foreign Nationals.

What a can, what a can, what a can, what a mighty good can.

You tell him Salt and Pepa.

We don’t need to pull the curtain back on the Wizard to know Progressives haven’t any heart, courage, or a brain among them, not even a left one at that.

We believe the left brain is responsible for logic, science, mathematics.

Three things with which we know Progressives have absolutely no concept.

I could list hundreds, nay, thousands of examples but one should suffice.

Liberals believe the Earth is dying due to human consumption, especially consumption in the United States. They’ve blamed everyone and everything they can, including our bovine friends.

Thinking logically would eventually bring their theory to a simple solution.

If human consumption is killing the planet, especially in America, the only way to stop this “12 year AOC bartending apocalypse” is to reduce the amount of humans in the world, especially in America.

The Liberal fix?

Allow tens of millions of CRIMINAL FOREIGN NATIONALS to not only stay and consume, but open the gates for millions more.

This is hypocritical, idiotic, and “highly ILLOGICAL” as Liberals continue to ignore Spock and take their cues from Tupac who so eloquently “rapped” “I ain’t got no motherfuckin friends, That’s why I fucked yo’ bitch”.

Sounds like ANTIFA or Gavin Newsom.

Speaking of Newsom-like qualities Joe Groper Biden continues to stagger down the political road strengthening the resume of his burgeoning comedic routine soon to be titled Barack Likes Me…He really really likes me.

His current “I’m not nuts,” when no was asking screams “The guilty flee when no man pursueth.”

What’s nuts is the idea that Bonehead Biden is possibly being overtaken by Cherokee Cheekbones Warren.

After watching Papaw’s granddaughter’s Elaine-like dancing it is clear her one sip from the White Mans whiskey was more than she could handle.

Put down the bottle and step away Fauxcahontas before you think your eye shape makes you an Apache.

Lizzy Warren took a flask, gave herself a sip of Jack, when she saw what she had done, she screamed it’s time to take the guns.

Some will say she was drinking beer Jason.

How do we know?

Her “plan” to save America can only be explained in one of two ways.

She’s completely hammered on some STRONG “medication” Hillary-style or she’s cuckaloo crazy.

Okay let’s be fair.

It’s a combination of both.

What’s amazing is her jump over Gang Rape Sanders.

I’ll bet ol Bernie didn’t fantasize about a woman in that position…at least not one woman.

Oh the Corn Kernel.

Lover of Communism, Castro, Kink, and Clinton cash.

Completely illogical.

Twelve years might be too long.

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com

www.freeamericanetwork.com

Are Dems at War with Religious Americans?

by Daveda Gruber:

On Saturday the Democratic National Committee passed a resolution which commended the values of “religiously unaffiliated” Americans.

The DNC praised Americans who have no religious affiliations as the largest religious group within their own party.

The resolution was unanimously passed by the Democratic Party at their summer meeting on August 24, 2019. The event was held in San Francisco, California.

The Secular Coalition of America, which lobbies on behalf of atheists, agnostics, and humanists on public policy was thrilled by the DNC’s move. This was the first time that a major party “embraced American nonbelievers.”

The resolution states that “religiously unaffiliated Americans overwhelmingly share the Democratic Party’s values” and adds that they should support “rational public policy based on sound science and universal humanistic values.”

This is the resolution that I am referring to:

The director of governmental affairs for the Secular Coalition of America, Sarah Levin, cited that it will ensure that policy is driven by science and evidence and not sectarian beliefs.

The Democratic Party announced it is targeting “nonreligious voters” to try to beat President Trump. As we are all aware, President Trump locked in the evangelical vote in 2016.

The DNC has heightened their expression on religious groups.

Levin stated that “America was founded as a secular government charged with representing and protecting the freedoms of people of all faiths and none. I am proud to see the Democratic Party take that to heart by bringing secular Americans into the fold.”

It appears that the Democrats have a problem with God. In their efforts to solve the problem, we go back to the 2012 election. At the DNC convention Democrats booed God.

In 2016, a preacher was heckled during the opening prayer. Also, on Saturday, Democrats took a swipe at believers who use “religious liberty” to threaten the civil rights of LGBTQ Americans.

The DNC would like to see every party at every level of government adopt similar resolutions.

We cannot let this happen. As far as I am concerned, to take God out of America would be a big mistake.

What say you? Should we keep God or reject God?

You can follow me on Twitter at https://twitter.com/DavedaGruber and comment and reply to my article. I’ll look forward to hearing from you.

R.E.D FRIDAY: Wear RED on Friday to Support Our Military

by Daveda Gruber:

I wear RED on Fridays. I have for a long time. To me it is out of respect for military who cannot be here to enjoy the freedoms that I have.

The military, who are deployed, are risking their lives for me to be free. Some lose their lives and my support, prayers and patriotism for them is shown by wearing something RED

Remembering Everyone Deployed! Wearing RED is the least I can do to support them and hope for them to come home safely and soon.

The Americans who support our troops, are the silent majority. We are not ‘organized to reflect who we are, or to reflect what our opinions are.

Many Americans, like yourself, would like to start a movement simply to recognize that Americans support our troops whether they are in the US or abroad.

We need to inform our local VFW’s and American Legion, our local press, local TV, and continue carrying the message to the national levels as we start to get this going. Our idea of showing our solidarity and support for our troops starts every Friday and continues on every Friday by wearing RED.

To be noticed, we wear RED. A RED t-shirt, hat, running shoes or any other type of apparel is perfect to show your support of our brave military.

Every RED-blooded American who supports our young men and women who are deployed abroad, WEAR SOMETHING RED! You can even purchase something from this site’s store to wear.

Wear RED on Fridays. SUPPORT OUR TROOPS! WE LIVE IN THE LAND OF THE FREE, BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE. It is FOR US that THEIR BLOOD RUNS RED!

May GOD BLESS our MILITARY and may GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Treated for Malignant Pancreatic Tumor

by Daveda Gruber:

It was announced on Friday that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is allegedly feeling good and getting better after three weeks of radiation therapy for a tumor on her pancreas.

Ginsburg is reported to have had a malignant tumor on her pancreas that was successfully treated.

A court spokesperson said in a statement, “The tumor was treated definitively and there is no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body. Justice Ginsburg will continue to have periodic blood tests and scans. No further treatment is needed at this time.”

This past July, the Supreme Court Justice had a routine blood test and an abnormality appeared. A biopsy was done and it revealed the tumor.

Radiation treatment for Ginsburg started on August 5th at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. The treatment was said to have been done with Bader Ginsburg being an outpatient.

Ginsburg is 86 years old and is said to have tolerated the treatment well. A bile duct stent was placed on her pancreas.

The statement also said, “The Justice tolerated treatment well. She canceled her annual summer visit to Santa Fe, but has otherwise maintained an active schedule.”

Ginsburg has made it clear that she has no intention of stepping down from the bench. She plans to hold her seat for as long as her health permits.

Ginsburg has had her fair share of ill health. She had surgery cancer surgery in December. She had colorectal cancer in 1999 and pancreatic cancer in 2009.

Justices usually return to work in September to begin the new Supreme Court term, which will begin on October 7th. I’ll be interested to see who shows up for work.

Late Bird: by Jason Kraus

by: Daveda Gruber

When you read a book, do you learn anything? That would depend on what book you read. My interests are varied and I have read many books in my life. I do not always write a review but this book opened up a story that I felt I had to read and then write about because it is so well written and applies to so many walks of life.

It tells a most amazing story. Falcon Sane, who is the main character in the story, grows up in an America which “Jack and Dianne” by John “Cougar” Mellencamp, becomes a reality.

What reality defines greatness? I’ve come to realize that when you have made a judgment on another, keep it open. You never know what will be revealed before it is closed.

Can a man actually forgive another man and can that make him great?

Read on. What is family and how can it be defined? What do ice cream and fascists and Winnie the Pooh have in common? Can sitting on a stump make you a better man? Maybe, but you’d have to read the book to find out.

The main character, Falcon, has a big heart and along with his caring personality, there underlies a man with a determined mindset who wants to make the future better for himself and more importantly, for all Americans.

The first half of the book is mostly about Falcon’s early childhood. The reader begins to find themselves immersed into a story that has the human element to draw the reader in. You get to know a boy who will, as you turn the pages, grow into a special kind of man. His love for sports and a yearning to learn by his own experiences will capture your interest and make you want to learn more about him.

The concept of caring about family is instilled in Falcon from an early age. Falcon confronts the presence of evil in a very unique manner. He’s a very patient and logical man but those traits were instilled in him at a young age and you actually feel a part of his growth as you get more involved in his story.

Being a leader is in Falcon’s blood. He was never one to follow others but rather he was always at the helm and holding the reigns.

Democracy is well defined by Falcon as he most wittingly explains what our country is; a Republic. He holds his loved ones, his country and his friends close to him. He’s a romantic who is looking for the love of his life. Will he find lasting love? You’ll have to read the book to find out because I don’t want to spoil the story.

As Falcon worked as a deputy in a large penitentiary, he had to deal with the criminal element of society. I learned by reading this novel that there are some people that you just don’t mess with and Falcon Sane is a man like that. But he is also a man who hears the cries of the people who are the lowest on the totem pole.

While he was still a young man, working as a Deputy, Falcon found out even an election for Sheriff can prove to be distasteful because of the way a decent man can be smeared by opponents of his views or interests.

Do young males and prisoners wear their pants hanging to project an image? Yes, according to the book. Prisoners wear their pants hanging to say that they are available to other male inmates. Yes, I said that and so does the book. The author knows what he is talking about. I didn’t but I sure found out by reading this book.

What party is to blame for the United States being the way it is? Well, according to this book, both. You’ll have to read it to find out how Falcon actually sees it.

Falcon Sane is concerned about the second amendment. Is it the potential protector of freedom or would it become the thing to take freedom away? It’s both and it will be explained.

The author gives a realization on sane verses insanity. Yes, Falcon Sane has some answers for us.

Have you ever been fired from a job that you know you did well at? Falcon endured problematic situations through his growth as a man, but somehow managed to learn from experience without the system corrupting him.

As the pages turn, the reader gets clues as to what Falcon’s life has prepared him for. There is a sense that this man was to become someone who is not easy to forget. He leaves a lasting impression on everyone he meets. And yes, he has a lot to offer to anyone who will listen.

As I got further involved in the story, I found that I had some conflicting ideas with the writer. As this story makes one feel that it is actually a memoire in the first half of the book, it actually takes on a different aspect in part two.

Falcon is on a quest for love and yes, he does find it and you can feel the romance taking shape in his descriptions of the woman he adores. He also has a love for animals and that comes through in the word usage.

Falcon decides to run for the highest office in the land. It is my opinion that he’s a different sort of candidate with a lot of new ideas.

In the book, Falcon runs as an Independent candidate who wants to change the rules of the long-standing election game. He wants to serve for one term and not two. He doesn’t like commercials or fundraising nor does he want more than one debate.

Falcon, if elected, wanted to get rid of the death tax. He also has a plan that he calls the United State Personal Responsibility Act of 2017. The plan would cut taxes and use a consumption tax. It’s all spelled out in the book with numbers from one to ten with sub-letters that take the plan into depth and represent a new complete overhaul of the tax system and how it is applied.

On page 462, we find that names from the movie “The Godfather” have been used to describe a person. No, it wasn’t Fredo this time.

By reading in between the lines, the Democratic candidate in the book seems to be someone like Hillary Clinton although the name is not even close. It appears that the Republican nominee was not spoken of, as much, and I don’t see it as being interpreted to be now President Donald Trump.

If you enjoy a really good story, you’ll love this book. It will make you pay attention to the country we live in and if you like politics, you’ll find it within the pages of this most amazing book. The novel will keep your interest and hold your attention.

There are places in the story that could make you cry. I know, I did but not with sadness. Tears may flow with emotion that is very defining. Yes, the book could make you cry in the same way that a movie would if it was presented in the right formation.

Maybe this book should be a movie. I’d go see it. But the book is always better than the movie? I don’t know in this case because there is no movie, yet.

If you choose to read this book, hold on, you’re about to take an awesome journey into a man’s life.

You may also see that what you want in a leader is not always in front of your face but can have a different look.

If Jason Kraus, the writer, is anything like the main character in this book, Falcon Sane, he’s someone who could be a great asset to our way of life or in a government role. I’m thinking the Senate.

Please read this book. You won’t be disappointed, that I can guarantee. If you learn from the book, thank the author. If you didn’t know about the author or the book, but are interested, I can give insight as to whether or not to read it. If you stumbled on my review, it was for a reason. Read this most incredible book.

Time For the Individual

Tariffs, tumbling markets, interest rates and an Epstein.

Regardless of the subject the absurdity of the propagandized Press continued this week.  Statements made in print and on television ranged from conspiracy theories and medical terminations made by non-physicians, to rationalizations and even justifications, depending upon the issue and the network.

One published statement decided to apply two completely opposite possibilities by stating that Jeffrey Epstein’s “autopsy results reportedly revealed he had multiple breaks in his neck bones, consistent with suicide by hanging or homicide by strangulation.”

Talk about covering all bases and horrible writing.

Let us help them with some editing.

“Reported autopsy results reveal multiple neck fractures. Further investigation is needed to assess whether subject’s death was suicide or homicide.”

I even heard a “medical doctor” attempt to explain how it was “possible” that an older man could break certain bones in his neck while committing suicide.

It’s also possible, and highly unlikely, that I might swim through a school of sharks, bleeding profusely, and never be attacked.

The reality is closer to one of these three.

(1) Through very powerful and wealthy accomplices Jeffrey Epstein was smuggled into a non-extradition area such as Morocco or the Vatican.

I’m sure he and the Pope could compare notes on sexual abuse and human trafficking.

(2) Epstein is now in witness protection with the greatest cover story ever created waiting to testify in future cases.

(3) Epstein was murdered.

These are the probable possibilities with a HEAVY leaning towards number three.

Predators such as Epstein feel zero guilt or remorse. The odds of this type of fecal matter taking his own life are exceedingly low.

We have prisons filled with this type of tripe, with access to “sheets,” and they all awaken each morning to line up for their tax-payer funded breakfast.

The issue here isn’t the Clintons, conspiracies, or even Epstein.

The issue here is the American Citizen has lost all trust in any and all forms of Government.

It’s been coming for a while.

From Carter to Clinton to Bush to Obama we’ve been continuously lied to from the Bully Pulpit.

For the last four decades criminal foreign nationals have invaded the United States and been given free water, food, shelter, medical care, education, and even citizenship all while the American is punished with higher taxation and less and less representation.

Multiple members of “Law Enforcement” have not only covered up too many crimes to mention but brazenly stand in front of the country and explain how laws were broken, but about it, nothing will be done.

In other words receiving a Comey.

Our Tech companies are choosing to help China rather than America and with the creation of 5G will make it even easier and faster for the Communist State to steal from us and endanger our way of life.

Citizens in Hong Kong are flying our Flag while Liberals in the Great Experiment burn, spit, and stomp.

That famous phrase attributed to the human condition that asked the simplest of questions.

Can the Individual not only grasp Liberty but push Freedom forward.

It is now very clear that most in America cannot handle this Adam Smith-like responsibility.

The combination of those who vote Liberal and those who don’t vote at all make up the majority of the people living here currently.

Fortunately we are a Republic.

Specifically a Constitutional Republic that protects the Individual.

It’s time for the Individual to decide whether or not they will protect their Constitutional Republic.

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com

www.freeamericanetwork.com

Will House Dems Retaliate Against US and Israel Ambassadors?

by Daveda Gruber:

On Saturday is was reported that House Democrats may use retaliatory moves on two diplomats over the decision to block Representatives Ilhan Omar D-MN., and Rashida Tlaib D-MI from traveling to Israel.

About twelve Senior Democratic Congress members have been reported to have been considering taking action against Israel’s ambassador to Washington, Ron Dermer, and David Friedman, the U.S. ambassador to Israel.

Allegedly, Democrats are considering a vote on legislative action against Dermer and opening an inspector general investigation into Friedman.

Back in the West Bank, Tlaib’s 90-year-old grandmother, Muftia Tlaib, used harsh words to send President Trump for his comments about the banned trip.

The elder Tlaib said, “Trump tells me I should be happy Rashida is not coming. May God ruin him.”

Here’s where I go off script for a moment. The Tlaib family is Muslim. The word used was most likely Allah and not God.

Omar and Tlaib are both Muslim. The two are also outspoken critics of Israel. They both support boycotts of the country.

In their plan to visit Jerusalem and the West Bank, Omar and Tlaib were going on a tour organized by a Palestinian organization aimed at highlighting the plight of the Palestinians.

The Israeli government blocked the planned trip but later said it would accept a humanitarian request from Tlaib to visit her Palestinian grandmother.

Tlaib’s reaction was that she would not travel to the West Bank to visit family. This was after getting permission hours  before from Israel’s interior minister.

President Trump had tweeted this:

Did Omar and Tlaib have good intentions for this trip? Only if you can decipher that it was going to be good for Palestinians because they were going to show the two freshman Congresswomen what they wanted the women to see.

After all, Omar and Tlaib’s tentative itinerary was titled “US Congressional Delegation to Palestine.” It never mentioned Israel.

Dead Men Tell No Tales but is Jeffrey Epstein Really Dead?

by Daveda Gruber:

Something has been bothering me and so I’ve been researching and I feel that I’ve just uncovered something rather interesting.

I’m not one to believe in conspiracy theories but when I get bothered by something, I have to investigate it. That’s my nature and I can’t change the way my mind works.

I saw the picture of Jeffrey Epstein dead on the gurney. I know that it was confirmed that Epstein was “dead on arrival” to hospital. That concerned me. If he was dead in the picture, his mouth would be open, right?

After death the body becomes completely limp and relaxed, and at this point, the mouth naturally falls open (in the same way it does when you are asleep in the chair).

So someone finding you five minutes after death would find you lying there with your mouth open. After a couple more hours, rigor mortis begins, and then your muscles become rigid. At that point, it’s quite difficult to get the mouth to close.

I have seen dying or deceased (dying from medical causes in the hospital) people who died with their mouths open due to lack of muscle tone. When you die, your muscles all relax. Your mouth falls open because the muscles are no longer taut to keep it closed.

Funeral attendants, where the deceased is to be displayed in an open casket, will deliberately close the mouth with a clip or stitch so that it looks more natural.

If Epstein was dead in the picture, his mouth would have been open.

I blew up the portion of the picture, where you can see a portion of his top lip, where Epstein is supposedly “dead on arrival” to hospital.

Any picture will get distorted at some point when you enlarge it to a stage where it is no longer in focus. But in this picture the distortion is in a particular spot.

You can see the distortion of the pixels on the top lip. The picture was, as I allege, carefully altered in that spot. Why? No one wanted anyone to see that his mouth was not open. To some it would mean nothing but to others who are in the know, it becomes obvious.

Epstein was unmarried and does not have any known children. It would appear that his younger brother Mark would be his next of kin and really the only close living relative. His estate is up for grabs but it is being said that Epstein’s money/assets will be tied up for many years.

Epstein had an awful lot of money in cash and in properties and airplanes and other things like artwork and his private Island, “Little St. James, in the United States Virgin Islands located off the east end of St. Thomas in the Caribbean Sea.

He had a reportedly had about $500 million dollars but that is only what was on paper that could be found. Epstein’s net worth is rather difficult to pin down.

Epstein’s Palm Beach estate alone is estimated to be worth over $12 million.

A court filing from the United States government and a filing by Epstein’s defense team both stated he owns six properties, along with other personal property. He appears to own the holdings through several shell companies named after trees. Some are:

Maple Inc.

Laurel Inc.

Cypress Inc.

Epstein’s money goes through a labyrinth of companies. It’s actually quite difficult to get accurate information.

This makes tracking Epstein’s fortune quite difficult. He may have money in many countries and he also may have another or many more residencies in other countries.

The man traveled frequently and met with the most prestigious people from all over the world.

Could Epstein have faked his own death, through his associates being paid a lot of cash, and could he be settling into a new life?

The answer is how you see it. Epstein’s wealth has never been determined. He lived the good life but was, in fact, a predator who liked very young girls. Could he have planned an elaborate plot to secure his well being if he were indicted? Well, yes, he could have.

Maybe one day the truth will come out but in my humble opinion, the facts are hush, hush and something isn’t right.

If I die from a suicide, please have an investigation. Thank you.

Did Dem Senators Send the SCOTUS a Warning?

by Daveda Gruber:

A few rather prominent Democratic Senators have sent a warning to the Supreme Court that it could face restructuring.

The SCOTUS got a message that was in the terms of a warning that was delivered as part of a brief that was filed on Monday to heal the court or face restructuring.

The brief was related to a New York City gun law.

Senators Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., brought up rulings by the court’s conservative majority. They implied that the problem must be remedied.

The brief states, “The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it. Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be ‘restructured in order to reduce the influence of politics.”

“Court packing” is a term that is widely used. A president who is picking judges, can in fact, change the way the court rules by picking justices who’s political status is preferred.

For this reason, the 2020 Democratic candidates have shown that they would be open to changing the number of justices on the Supreme Court.

In favor of this option are:

Former Representative Beto O’Rourke of Texas

Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey

Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts

Senator Kamala Harris of California

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York

Mayor of Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Ind., proposed a plan to expand the court by have some justices appointed by the president and others selected by the other justices in order to “depoliticize” the court.

Former Vice President Joe Biden has said that he is against court-packing.

Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont has suggested rotating judges to other courts.

The brief in question that the Democrat senators have filed was in the case of New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. City of New York, which dealt with legal limitations on where gun owners could transport their licensed, locked, and unloaded firearms.

New York City recently changed the law to ease restrictions. Now  would be the time to get the conservative majority in the SCOTUS to rule in favor of gun owners.

The Democratic senators are urging the court to stay out of the case brought by the NRA-backed group. But if the court still decides to hear the case, a ruling against New York City could prevent other cities and states from passing similar gun control laws.

The entire brief can be seen here:

BRIEF TO SCOTUS

The Supreme Court has, at this time, five Conservative judges and four Liberal judges. We can thank President Trump for that.

If the numbers change under a Democrat president, the scales would never tilt in our favor.

If the judges are rotated, I’m not sure what that would bring, but it would not be consistent, that’s for sure.

Personally I’d like to see Trump get one or two more judges, who he has picked, onto the highest court in the land.