Category Archives: opinion

University of California, Davis Supports Professor who Called for all Cops to be Murdered

 
Leave a comment

Recently on the radio a talking head uttered “Uh huh, uh huh, uh yeah, no, well you know, uh huh.”

It appeared he tried to cover the subject with all possibilities.

How very Progressive of him.

Of course this is nothing compared to others.

A “professor” who is currently employed by the University of California, Davis has stated many times that all “cops” need to be killed.

That “cops” are an oppressive force, are no longer needed and should be murdered.

He apparently doesn’t realize that if “cops” are no longer in/of service, he and all of his friends won’t be “teaching” anymore.

This is not because they would be fired or put on sabbatical.

They’d be dead.

I have been on this planet for almost five decades.

I sat in Carter’s gas lines, sat through public school emergency drills that had us hide under our desks in case of nuclear holocaust and watched America elect a Bill, a Bush and a Barry and through it all I can accurately say I’ve never seen so many stupid people saying so many stupid things as to what is occurring today.

(1) Cigarettes are bad for you but marijuana is medicine.

We can legally drive cars while smoking one of these two and that one isn’t Mary Jane. We know marijuana is a Depressant that kills cells everywhere in our bodies including our brain, lungs, pancreas, liver, etc.

No BODY is better due to the ingestion of THC.

Those of you telling yourself Smoke is good for you are practicing what is called Rationalization or Justification. I’d explain the difference between the two but it would be a waste of my time. It’s doubtful you’d understand and I know you are too high to care.

For those with sober minds Kamala Harris is a perfect example of a dope who inhales. She actually bragged about it, blamed it on her Jamaican family and then called herself an African-American. She is so damaged she has called for “reparations” while reportedly being a descendant of a slave owner.

It appears Oppression and hypocrisy are both found in her “chronic” DNA.

How very Obamaesque.

When will she admit to the cocaine usage and being friends with Bill Ayres or whatever she was with Willie Brown?

The only group more damaged than this Bob Marley wannabe are the ones who voted for the continentally challenged bigot.

By the way Libs her mother is from India.

That would be Asia in case you are keeping score at home.

(2) If we don’t stop all the human consumption happening in the United States we will all be dead in twelve years.

If this is true (and of course it isn’t) why are we allowing more HUMANS into the country and why isn’t this the ONLY question being asked of the Gangrene Group?

If we are this close to total destruction why aren’t they supporting President Trump to keep out as many people as possible?

Less people less consumption.

Food doesn’t eat itself.

If they really believed this garbage then how can they argue locking down the border isn’t an emergency?

These imbeciles and their brethren are living proof that all people are not created equal.

They are knock-knock jokes without a punchline.

This is basic stuff.

One plus one will never equal fish.

Never.

They know not therefore they speak yet the media doesn’t challenge even the simplest of things.

If they are so worried about fossil fuels please explain how electricity will work without them?

While you’re at it what is AC and DC?

I can hear it now.

“Electricity will only work if it’s paid a living wage and AC/DC is racist because everyone knows Back in Black is about a bus ride.”

Ah I had forgotten.

February was just completed.

The celebration of the shortest month of the year and the exact opposite of what Martin Luther King preached.

By all means bring on Kaepernick and Farrakhan!

Two clowns who kneel for Sharia and call for the death of Jews, White People and Uncle Apostate Toms.

Wait now Jason those two aren’t “mainstream” for the Democratic Party.

Anal Cavity Colon was on the cover of Time, Louis smiles with Soetoro (even Snopes can’t deny this) and was also found on stage at Aretha Franklin’s funeral standing with none other than Bill Oral Sex Isn’t Sex Clinton.

OSIS or OSIL to its Islamic supporters with Russian “flexibility”.

American Uranium and a Reset Button for all!

How much more “mainstream” do you want it?

Do they all need to hug Robert Byrd and drop $150,000,000,000 on Iran?

Look at all those zeros.

It’s like a Cheekbones Warren “rally”.

I digress.

The Liberals are so filled with “hate” they are now attacking themselves and burning down their own houses.

I say bring it on!

Self-flagellation for all Progressives!

What’s that Jason?

Flatulation?

I thought we told you NO MORE COWS! Haven’t you heard? Ninety-seven percent of scientists think the world is warming, oh wait, no cooling, oh wait, what did Al Gore say? Polar caps should be gone by now? Actually getting thicker? Record snow in the Sierras? California dams are so full billions of gallons of water are being flushed into the rivers and out into the Pacific Ocean as we speak? I thought we were having a drought?

“Uh huh, uh huh, uh yeah, no, well you know, uh huh.”

My fellow Americans.

Do not fret.

Do not fear.

Preparation and resolve will carry the day.

Eventually the Liberals are going to get what they want.

The day 911 will stop working.

You see I’m willing to make a deal with the “government” and I’m sure many of my Brothers and Sisters will join me.

I will never call 911 or expect any protection from the “government” from this day forward as long as no form of “government” will ever question me on how I handle my business.

The Liberals should love this deal.

After about three months human consumption should drop dramatically and the need for law enforcement may disappear completely.

We can call this a WIN WIN.

One round at a time.

Someone just needs to ring the bell.

My guess is an appreciation for “cops” will soon reappear and Progressives may be more amenable to an explanation of the importance of Carbon and how human behavior has never and will never control the Earth.

EVER.

Then again we may just have to keep handling our business.

“Uh huh, uh huh, uh yeah, no, well you know, uh huh.”

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com

www.freeamericanetwork.com

Sign, Sign Everywhere a Sign

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

Residents and visitors to Hollywood California got a rather interesting view. A billboard was in clear sight on Friday morning. A group of Conservative street artists had put up their work of art.

A billboard, which just happened to be across the street from CNN, was taken over by the artists known as “The Fraction.”

“The Fraction” mocked CNN with their latest project that also made fun of  its president Jeff Zucker for its coverage, or lack thereof, of the summit in Hanoi, Vietnam.

This week’s summit between President Donald Trump and North Korean Dictator Kim Jong Un was actually the big news of the week.

The billboard must have been a sight to behold. I’m sure that Republican views must have caused laughter and agreement with the wording. On the other hand, Democrats may have thought it wasn’t so funny.

The billboard referred to CNN as “Communist News Network.” It also had the phrase “Keep Korea divided” with an asterisk that read “because OrangeManBad.”

The sign also featured an image of Jeff Zucker. The title given to the CNN president was “CEO, CNNPC,” a reference to the “non-playable character” meme which has depicted liberals as robotic.

Okay, I think that’s funny but I really don’t think of CNN as real new, in fact, I’ve called them “Fake News” for a very long time now.

Hollywood Reporter tweeted this:

An anonymous member of “The Faction” told The Hollywood Reporter, “When Trump speaks glowingly of Kim Jong Un it’s a tactic. Zucker and his journo-activists know this, but are more than willing to try to torpedo the summit — the future of the long-suffering North and South Korean people be damned.”

After seven hours of being seen, the sign was taken down and replaced with an advertisement for a marijuana dispensary.

Did you see either one of them? I didn’t see them in person but lyrics came into my mind when I saw the sign. The lyrics to the song say it all:

“Sign, sign, everywhere a sign
Blockin’ out the scenery, breakin’ my mind
Do this, don’t do that, can’t you read the sign?”

The two leaders at the Hanoi summit couldn’t agree on the terms of an agreement. The Trump and Kim summit ended earlier than expected.

On Wednesday CNN gave practically no coverage to the summit. They instead kept the spotlight on the turbulent congressional testimony of former Trump attorney and “fixer” Michael Cohen.

While the congressional hearing was interesting, it didn’t compare to the Summit.

Trump Puts a Damper on Cohen’s Book Manuscript

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

On Friday President Trump sought to discredit his onetime lawyer, Michael Cohen, by tweeting some of his thoughts on a book deal that Cohen was seeking.

The book deal that has been reportedly proposed paints Trump in a very different light that what was described by Cohen while he testified to Congress this week.

Cohen testified before a Congressional committee for three days in both public and private hearings on Capitol Hill.

Cohen was shopping the book to publishers weeks before the FBI raid on his office. It was reported that Cohen promised chapters would focus on first lady Melania Trump and Trump’s children, as well as the “unfortunate saga” of Stormy Daniels.

Trump’s tweets reflected his feeling on the matter:

The now-disbarred attorney gave disdainful testimony about Trump before the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday. Cohen out rightly called Trump a “racist,” a “conman” and “a cheat.”

Cohen’s testimony came after he pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about a Trump real estate project in Russia as part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling and potential collusion with Trump campaign associates.

Cohen has pleaded guilty to five counts of tax evasion, one count of making false statements to a financial institution, one count of willfully causing an unlawful corporate contribution, and one count of making an excessive campaign contribution.

Now the president and his Republican allies have aggressively sought to discredit the former Trump loyalist.

On Thursday, Reps. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) wrote to Attorney General William P. Barr, asking him to investigate whether Cohen had perjured himself this week when he insisted during his testimony that he had not wanted a job in the Trump administration. Cohen said that he had been content to serve as Trump’s personal lawyer.

On Friday Republicans seized a video clip that has recently resurfaced from a November 2016 appearance by Cohen on CNN.

During the interview, Cohen is pressed by CNN’s Chris Cuomo about whether he would move from New York to Washington with Trump.

When asked if there was a chance Trump would ask him to take a job on either “the political side” or the “governmental side,” Cohen says, “I certainly hope so.” Asked if he’d go to Washington, Cohen says, “One hundred percent.”

During Wednesday’s congressional testimony, Cohen told lawmakers he was “extremely proud” to be the personal attorney for Trump as he became president.

But during his testimony Cohen said, “I did not want to go to the White House. I was offered jobs.”

Alleged contradictions seem to be surfacing from every which way. Cohen has promised to return to Capitol Hill and testify on March 6, 2019.

Cohen’s lawyer is Lanny Davis who is a longtime Clinton ally. From 1996 to 1998, he served as a special counsel to former President Bill Clinton. That fact alone makes me think that there is something rather fishy going on.

Trump said prosecutors should start looking at Democrats “where real crimes were committed.”

I agree with that 100 percent. As a Republican, I’ve been waiting for the real criminals to be arrested for what feels like a very long time.

Acosta Caught Up in Yet Another Lie

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

Were Jim Acosta’s feelings hurt? On Thursday President Trump didn’t call on the CNN reporter in a news conference after the abrupt end to the Hanoi summit between the U.S. and North Korea.

After the news conference Acosta claimed that Trump may have avoided  White House press corps journalists. Why, you ask? Well, Acosta believes or appeared to know the answer. He made an assumption that he and other White House press corps journalists were not called on in an effort to dodge questions about Michael Cohen.

Michael Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer, testified Wednesday on the Capitol Hill.

Acosta said, “First of all, we have to point out the obvious, which is the president steered clear largely during this news conference of the White House press corps and instead selected journalists at random from the other side of the room, where foreign journalists were seated.”

Acosta apparently forgot to mention that Trump called on at least two journalists from the White House press corps; just not Acosta. The first journalist to be called on by Trump was CBS’s Major Garrett. Also, ABC News’ Jonathan Karl, who questioned Trump on Cohen’s testimony. So, did Acosta Lie? You tell me.

The air travel distance is equal to 8,584 miles. The air travel shortest distance between United States and Vietnam is 13,814 km or 8,584 miles. If you travel with an airplane (which has average speed of 560 miles) from United States to Vietnam, It takes 15.33 hours to arrive. That’s a long flight from any airport in the U.S.. It bewilders me why a journalist who traveled that distance to cover a summit, would waste a question on  asking about a completely different subject than the one at hand.

Trump had an answer for the Cohen question, which occurred in Washington, more than 13,000 miles from Hanoi, and said, “[Michael Cohen] lied a lot. But it was very interesting because he didn’t lie about one thing, he said, ‘no collusion with the Russian hoax.’”

Other U.S.-based outlets that also questioned Trump included the New York Times, the Washington Post, NPR, and Bloomberg.

Acosta must have felt really scorned because he added that Trump “was calling on reporters from Russian state media, Chinese state media and Sean Hannity from Fox.” Acosta added that it “was by design because he didn’t want to really answer questions about Michael Cohen.”

The CNN star reporter then took to Twitter and tweeted:

It appears the Acosta may be jealous of Sean Hannity, who did get a question. I tweeted back to Acosta and told him what was on my mind:

Acosta later acknowledged that Trump did answer a question on Cohen, though he did observe that Trump called the testimony yesterday a “fake hearing.”

I must reiterate that questions in Hanoi related to the summit would have been more appropriate.

Are Babies and Children the Enemy of Democrats?

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

Penny Nance, the leader of a women’s group, Concerned Women for America, came down hard on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez D-N.Y. and other Democrats.

The CEO was reported to have said, “What’s is old is new again. AOC questioning if it is still okay to have children because of climate change is the same apoplectic anti-child rhetoric we’ve heard before.”

Nance also reportedly said,  “We heard about this in the late 1960s with zero population growth crowd who warned that we needed to limit our families or doomsday would come. Now, we worry about replacement rates.”

In an Instagram Live stream last weekend, Ocasio-Cortez spoke about climate change and the ever mounting student loans. She then told her 2.5 million followers these issues have led “young people” to question whether or not they should bring more children into the world.

Ocasio-Cortez said, “Our planet is going to face disaster if we don’t turn this ship around. And so it’s basically like, there is a scientific consensus that the lives of children are going to be very difficult and it does lead, I think young people, to have a legitimate question. You know, should—is it okay to still have children?”

She went on to say, “Not just financially because people are graduating with 20, 30, 100 thousand dollars of student loan debt so they can’t even afford to have kids in the house, but there’s also just this basic moral question, like, what do we do?”

Ocasio-Cortez continued, “And even if you don’t have kids, there are still children here in the world and we have a moral obligation to them to leave a better world to them.”

A Twitter user tweeted this out:

Conservatives, needless to say, were rather critical of Ocasio-Cortez’s comments.

Nance, while being upset over what Ocasio-Cortez said, also called out Senate Democrats linked them to Rep. Ocasio-Cortez for voting down a bill Monday that would have protected infants that survived abortions.

Nance told reporters, “The common thread in all of this is that the Left is rarely in favor of having babies and certainly never in favor of large families. In fact, in many cases babies are considered the enemy. Sadly, it was this belief system on full display yesterday when 44 Democratic Senators voted against protecting survivors of abortion.”

The bill in question would have protected infants that survived failed abortions. It would have also sent doctors who didn’t try to save these babies to prison.

So, even if a baby survives an abortion, it is still maintained that the child has no rights to have his or her life saved under the law as it stands.

Anti-Abortion Movie to Hit Screens with “R” Rating

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

What turns a former Planned Parenthood clinical director into a pro-life activist? A new controversial film is coming to theaters soon and will tell the story.

Abby Johnson’s story is the subject of a new controversial film. The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) gave Pure Flix’s anti-abortion film “Unplanned” an R rating.

Thirty-eight year old Johnson told FOX News in a written statement, “We are pushing the boundaries of what has never been before on such a wide scale by showing America exactly what abortion is — and abortion is disturbing. It’s violent.”

Johnson went on to say, “In my opinion, one of the most impactful films of our time is ‘The Passion of the Christ.’ It was rated R. So I feel like ‘Unplanned’ is in good company. An R rating from the MPAA isn’t going to slow this movie down. I believe people are ready for the truth.”

Pure Flix is the production and distribution company behind the film. It is a Christian movie studio that produces, distributes, and acquires “Christ centered movies,” according to its mission statement.

The plan is for “Unplanned” to be released on March 29. The movie is a feature-length production and is set to be released on 800 screens.

Michael Scott, president of Pure Flix said, “This is why Pure Flix exists: to give a platform to these types of movies. We’re proud to be associated with this film and we are confident that our fans will not stay away because of the opinions of reviewers and listen to those in the faith community who have seen the film and agree with us. In this case, R stands for recommended.”

Mike Lindell, an investor in “Unplanned” dismissed the ‘R’ rating by the MPAA which is the Motion Picture Association of America.

The co-writers and co-directors of the film, Cary Solomon and Chuck Konzelman said, “We consider the MPAA’s current standards to be deeply flawed, insofar as they allow scenes of remarkably graphic sex, violence, degradation, murder and mayhem to have a PG-13 rating, whereas our film, highlighting the grave dangers of abortion in a straightforward manner, is considered dangerous for the American people to view.”

Lindell said, “Unplanned” tells the true story of Abby Johnson, who previously worked at Planned Parenthood as a clinic director, but resigned in 2009 and became a pro-life activist. (Pure Flix)

Lindell feels that “the fix is in. Whoever rated this movie must not be watching TV or videos on social media! I have a cameo in this movie and do not appreciate the R-rating. I got involved to get a message out to everyone with this true story. What a shame that some might be blocked by an R-rating from getting the truth. I hope millions of Americans will ignore this attempt at moviegoer suppression and flood the box office on opening day.”

MPAA told Pure Flix the most problematic scene of “Unplanned” featured a doctor gazing at a computer screen that shows the image of a fetus as the abortion is completed. Dr. Anthony Levatino, who was portrayed in the scene, said the depiction is accurate.

Ken Rather, executive VP of distribution for Pure Flix said, “A 15 year-old-girl can get an abortion without her parent’s permission but she can’t see this movie without adult supervision? That’s sad.”

Levatino, who performed about 1,200 abortions over the years said, “The portrayal of a live, moving fetus disappearing is very accurate. You’re watching an abortion. It’s an accurate view of what’s happening. It’s disturbing if you recognize it’s a human life.”

Solomon claimed, “We have three scenes in the film which directly address abortion, and the MPAA objected to all three. They specifically made mention of objection to grainy, black and white sonogram images that were part of one of the scenes. It was clear that any meaningful treatment of the issue was going to be objectionable.”

I’m not the person rating the film but whatever the rating, this film is important for people to see. Maybe it can enlighten some who look at abortion as a normal part of life.

Just maybe the movie can change the mind of someone who thinks they should have an abortion. Furthermore, maybe the film can save the lives of innocent babies, through no fault of their own, are not wanted.

Trailer to the film, “Unplanned”:

More videos you may find interesting:

We Live For America

 
Leave a comment

This week I could talk about the sexual predator known as Bernie Sanders who declared himself to be a candidate for President.

I can hear his enablers (supporters) right now.

“What are you talking about Jason?”

The Corn Kernel stated “women fantasize about being raped simultaneously by three different men.”

One can only imagine what this pervert is like at parties.

Actually we don’t need an imagination.

That’s what Meryl Streep’s “God” Harvey Weinstein is for.

Liberals.

Can’t live with em.

Don’t want to.

I could talk about the Bigot Biden who will be in the mix very soon.

His followers won’t even ask.

They’re afraid he’ll put them all “back in chains” especially if they aren’t “clean” or run a 7-Eleven with a slight accent.

Oh it’s just Uncle Joe as they whisper to each other in a warning to keep their children out of his grip.

Then again maybe they don’t care.

We know the Pope doesn’t.

I could talk about the idiot who hired two Nigerians to beat him up and then blamed it on white Trump supporters.

What kind of gender is named Jussie?

Female? Male?

As we are now making up genders how about Pale, Fail, Tale or Bail?

He does enjoy his bleach, is a complete disaster as a human, loves to tell stories and is now out on it.

I could talk about fictional Liberal gibberal like Climate Change, the Earth being flat or that the U.S.A is a Democracy.

We could discuss how neither Party sans President Trump wants the border closed.

It’s true.

The Dems had the opportunity with Barack.

All we got was a Law nobody read, ISIS and ten trillion more in debt.

Thanks Obama!

The RINOS had two years with President Trump.

All they did was lose the House.

It appears Progressivism (Oppression) has infected the country like a bunch of unvaccinated Hondurans or Washingtonians.

What a depressing bunch.

Is it any wonder I never spend time with Liberals?

They live as if today is their last.

No hope, no dreams, no chance for romance, just eat, drink, and fornicate as much as you can until one expires.

Sounds like the Sixties or todays cruise ships.

Americans don’t live as if today is our last.

We live as if today is our FIRST!

We work hard, save our money and are beneficial to others.

We then get up the next day and do it all over again.

We dream, we plan, we grow and we appreciate the incredible gifts that have been bestowed upon us.

We embrace Free Will as the ultimate gift from the Big Fella Upstairs and as Americans we don’t ask for anything else.

God has done enough.

The rest is up to us.

We know that being born an American has given us the greatest home field advantage known to Man and instead of wasting it with booze, pills and debauchery we leap forward excited that every day is a new one filled with opportunities available to those who accept that the only culture we will ever embrace is Freedom and that to do so Personal Responsibility is our ever most present and important decision.

We do not plan our own demise, sell our children’s body parts or pretend to build trains to nowhere.

There is no greater force than the Individual who does the right thing because it is the right thing to do.

We have a name for this. It is known far and wide. It is shared in hallowed halls, well built barns and on street corners not named desire.

It is called American.

God has shed His grace on thee.

It would be wise to embrace that grace.

The measurement of a man or a woman is found in the simple act of love or giving to others without expectation but even love has its limits.

Evil does indeed exist and seems to be found everywhere one looks these days.

It’s found paying others to put a rope around its neck.

It’s found in its allowance of human trafficking to continue to occur.

It’s found in its celebration of the murder of infants.

To help those, who will not help themselves, is not love.

To protect those who molest, rape and kill is decidedly un-American.

The time is now.

Step into the fray.

Understand your role as a citizen of these United States.

Those citizens that have a responsibility to push Freedom Forward regardless of difficulty.

We don’t live as though this is our last day.

We live as though these are our best days and tomorrow will be even better!

Stand with me.

Embrace your place and prepare to ensure that when your story is told it will be told with joy, with purpose and with passion and will never end as we don’t live for the Now.

We live for America.

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com

www.freeamericanetwork.com

Why Hillary Clinton Was Not Locked Up

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

Whatever happened to locking up Hillary Clinton? We were waiting  patiently to see justice served and that day has not come. The FBI never gave Conservatives reason to feel that the guilty, no matter how far up the political chain, would be punished for the crimes they allegedly committed.

It appears that someone thought there was wrong doing. The FBI’s top lawyer in 2016 under ex-Director James Comey the FBI’s top lawyer thought that Hillary Clinton and her team should have immediately realized that they were mishandling “highly classified” information based on the obviously sensitive nature of the emails’ contents sent through Hillary’s private server.

According to a transcript of his closed-door testimony before congressional committees last October, former FBI general counsel James Baker believed she should have been prosecuted until “pretty late” in the investigation.

Baker said high-level officials at the bureau were “arguing about” whether to bring charges against Clinton. He originally thought that Clinton’s behavior was “alarming” and “appalling.”

Baker said, “So, I had that belief initially after reviewing, you know, a large binder of her emails that had classified information in them. And I discussed it internally with a number of different folks, and eventually became persuaded that charging her was not appropriate because we could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that…we, the government, could not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that… she had the intent necessary to violate (the law).”

Baker told lawmakers that it was “the nature and scope of the classified information that, to me, initially, when I looked at it, I thought these folks should know that this stuff is classified, that it was alarming what they were talking about, especially some of the most highly classified stuff.”

Democrats clearly recall then candidate Donald Trump, while on the campaign trail, vowing to prosecute Mrs. Clinton if he won the election.

Brian Fallon, who was Mrs. Clinton’s campaign spokesman, said, “It was alarming enough to chant ‘lock her up’ at a campaign rally. It is another thing entirely to try to weaponize the Justice Department in order to actually carry it out.”

On the other hand, Conservatives said Mrs. Clinton should not be immune from scrutiny as a special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, investigates Russia’s interference in last year’s election and any connections to Mr. Trump’s campaign. They argued, for instance, that Mrs. Clinton was the one doing Russia’s bidding in the form of a uranium deal approved when she was Secretary of State.

A December letter by former House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy and former House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte said the decision not to prosecute Clinton was not unanimous.

Under questioning by Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, Baker spoke extensively about the back and forth arguments.

Here’s part of that discussion:

Ratcliffe: All right. Are you a reasonable prosecutor?

Baker: Not anymore. I’m not a prosecutor anymore. 

Then there is a quick exchange of questions and answers. Ratcliff pivots back to Baker’s decision to change his mind regarding Clinton.

Ratcliffe: You were persuaded, and stated as a basis, that ultimately you were persuaded there was a lack of evidence establishing knowledge or criminal intent, correct?

Baker: Yes.

Ratcliffe: When were you persuaded?

Baker: Sorry. Pretty late in the process, because we were arguing about it, I think, up until the end.

Ratcliffe: Yeah, So Jim Comey had reached the opposite conclusion as early as – or I guess as late as May the 2nd of 2017, as reflected in the memo that he created, correct?

Baker: I know there’s been a lot of public discussion about that – this way I experienced that interaction and other interactions with Jim Comey is he would throw things out like that to get people to start talking and thinking about it and test his conclusions against others and get them to push back. And so, it was – I believe it was in that process that I read these emails and we had these discussions and arguments.

Baker’s testimony was considered credible by those in the room.

In a televised interview on July 3, 2016, Clinton claimed that she had “never received nor sent any material that was marked classified” using her personal email system.

Later on she said she regretted using the setup after it emerged that her private servers contained classified materials from Special Access Programs, or SAP, which are considered some of the most closely held U.S. government secrets.

So, there you have it. Hillary was very close to being held accountable for her alleged negligent behavior. It appears that Comey’s influence stopped the investigation in its tracks.

Did a Coup D’etat Nearly Take Down President Trump?

  ,
Leave a comment

by Daveda Gruber:

Did you ever want to be a fly on the wall to see and hear what was going on in a particular situation? I have thought about it many times. What I did not realize is even though I wasn’t there to see and hear, I already knew the answers to some questions that were rather important and stuck in my mind.

On Monday President Trump drew a conclusion that, for some reason, I had already written about. When Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi spoke about a “wrap-up smear,” it appeared clear that this method was used by the FBI in securing a FISA warrant against then candidate Donald Trump and eventually getting a special counsel to investigate it.

By putting two and two together, I fully understood what it meant and came up with what the “insurance policy” was that Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were referring to and implicating “Andy,” who is former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, with them.

McCabe was clear on his statement that Rosenstein was “absolutely serious” when he suggested recording Trump in the tumultuous days following James Comey’s firing as FBI director.

President Trump accused Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and McCabe of pursuing an “illegal and treasonous” plot against him.

Trump called McCabe a liar before lashing out at top DOJ and FBI officials, including ousted Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

McCabe was fired last year by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Trump did not hold back when he tweeted:

McCabe recently wrote a book and revived some issues during promotional interviews for the forthcoming tell all book.

McCabe appeared on CBS News’ “60 Minutes” and detailed private DOJ alleged discussions about secretly recording and potentially ousting the president.

McCabe claimed he “never actually considered taking [Rosenstein] up on the offer.” He said he did discuss the matter with the FBI’s then-general counsel, James A. Baker.

Last autumn Baker told lawmakers during a closed-door deposition that McCabe and Page came to Baker “contemporaneously” and told him details of the meeting where Rosenstein made the comments about the wearing of a wire. Baker told congressional investigators he took the word of McCabe and Page “seriously.”

McCabe told CBS News that “I think the general counsel had a heart attack” when he told him of Rosenstein’s plan.

McCabe added, “And when he got up off the floor, he said, ‘I, I, that’s a bridge too far. We’re not there yet.”

The plot thickened when days later, Rosenstein appointed former FBI Director Robert Mueller as a special counsel to oversee the bureau’s investigation into allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials through the Russia probe, which has also involved examining whether the president obstructed justice.

Rosenstein, who has repeatedly has denied he “pursued or authorized recording the president,” has denied McCabe’s suggestion that the deputy attorney general had broached the idea of invoking the Constitution’s 25th Amendment.

The 25th Amendment allows Cabinet members to seek the removal of a president if they conclude that he or she is mentally unfit.

The Justice Department resonated both denials in a statement released last week and said that Rosenstein “was not in a position to consider invoking the 25th Amendment.”

This differs from what McCabe said in the interview, “Rod raised the [25th Amendment] issue and discussed it with me in the context of thinking about how many other Cabinet officials might support such an effort.” He then added that he believed Rosenstein was “counting votes or possible votes” to remove Trump from office.

Baker, in his testimony to Congress, provided even more details about the alleged 25th Amendment discussions and said that two Cabinet officials were “ready to support” such an effort.

Baker testified, “I was being told by some combination of Andy McCabe and Lisa Page, that, in a conversation with the Deputy Attorney General, he had stated that he…this was what was related to me…that he had at least two members of the president’s Cabinet who were ready to support, I guess you would call it, an action under the 25th Amendment.”

Allegedly, Rosenstein told McCabe he might be able to persuade then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions and then-Secretary of Homeland Security and later White House chief of staff John Kelly to invoke the 25th Amendment.

This whole scenario stinks of a Coup d’etat to me. It is my opinion that the “insurance policy” was contrived to take the newly elected President Trump out of office. Sadly, the Mueller lead Russia investigation was started with fabricated lies that were written about in the mainstream media and given relevance and then were blown up by the Democrats.

Now, go back to Pelosi’s description of the “wrap-up smear” and it will all make perfect sense to you as it is to me.

The “Deep State” is alive and well and living in the murky waters of “the swamp.”

Gruesome Twosome Newsom Didn’t Get the Memo

 
Leave a comment

White Privileged-Liberal Progressive-Sharia-Democratic Socialism sure is a funny thing.

Within a seven day window the Democratic Party’s new It Girl and her White Men announced, among many things, the creation of high speed rail across these United States.

In that same window a waxen pale face in California cancelled the boondoggle project of another pasty pinhead, known as HIGH SPEED RAIL.

I guess Gruesome Twosome Newsom didn’t get the memo.

When the Bartender speaks, the Bartender speaks yet apparently the Bartender is no E.F. Hutton.

Of course when she does, no one has any clue as to what she is saying, including Alex from Amazon…err the Bronx.  #ByeByeBezosNotInHerHouse/InsertLaughTrackHere.

Here are two quotes.

“I think what I meant is like um,” only later to be followed by “I am not the expert in geopolitics…on this issue.”

For the love of all that’s holy will someone please ask this prize when Guam will finally tip over!

Better yet who was buried in Grant’s Tomb?

Which weighs more ten pounds of gold or ten pounds of feathers?

How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

That would be must see TV!

I am fascinated by a Party who continues to make plans for the next couple of decades, when they’ve already stated we will all be dead, in less than twelve years.

That’s gotta be some of that Common Core math.

These are the same Mathlympians who paid less in taxes all year long and then complained that their tax refunds shrank.

“I think what I mean is like um.”

Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition will someone, ANYONE, please tell her what she thinks she means.

Can we find this person who is “not the expert in geopolitics on this issue” and then ask them exactly ABOUT THIS ISSUE!

I don’t know what the “issue” is but does it really matter? Just pick one and ask her.

I’ll start.

We will make it an all encompassing question so we don’t leave out any in the cisgender category.

Dear Progressives,

If you hate White men so much why do you keep doing Late Night television?

Hmmm…need a minute?

Okay, take your time, hypocrisy can be difficult to choke down.  I have a followup.

If you are so diverse why didn’t you raise the roof for Arsenio or Tragic Johnson?

Why can’t Wayne Brady get a permanent “Later” gig?

You down with Black Face Kimmel, the Virginia Governor and the Virginia Attorney General but not Montel after dark?

Still need a minute?

I’ll betcha do and where are you #MeTooers?

You tuned into the alabaster ghastly groper known as Letterman for decades but no Wendy Williams?

She be all dat and a bag of wigs!

Do I be keepin’ it too real?

What’s good for one “cultural appropriator” is good for another.

Isn’t that right Cheekbones Warren?

Ol Elizabeth must like playing Twenty-One because she was caught doubling down in Texas!

As Sammy Hagar knows all too well, the girl gets around.

You frontin’ for Stephen Colbert?

Can’t get more saltine than that cracker!

Okay, okay.

Let’s finish with a flourish and borrow from a famous red neck.

“You might be a” Liberal if you call United States currency “dead presidents” and then state Benjamin Franklin is your favorite.

“You might be a” Liberal if walls don’t work but you live in a house made out of (insert Sam Kinison here) WALLS, with locks and doors, all surrounded by a fence.

Finally “you might be a” Liberal if you scream for skin color diversity (bigotry) but then use Sweden as your example of how a country should be run.

KISS is an acronym for Keep It Simple Stupid.

These Progressives are aptly named as in SS and are indeed SIMPLY STUPID.

The only question left is why are we KEEPING IT?”

Jason Kraus

www.aleadernotapolitician.com

www.freeamericanetwork.com